The story of one painting or Feyko-Deeds of the past, on the employee of the Official farm

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Good day, dear subscribers and blog readers! This material is devoted to the image of the Bronze Horseman, which causes many disputes and disagreements in the "alternative" Runet.. Let's try to figure out the history of its origin, and with the content itself - what is actually depicted there?

First, we will briefly familiarize ourselves with the biography of Ben Patersen, and then, we will deal directly with a critical examination of his work, which is very ambiguous … So, let's start with a prayer.. (Bless, Father!)

BIOGRAPHI of.

Benjamin Patersen (svej / Swede Benjamin Patersen, 1750, Varberg - 1815, St. Petersburg) is a Swedish portrait painter who worked for a significant part of his life in St. Petersburg.

Benjamin Patersen was born in Varberg, Sweden, and received his art education in Gothenburg. In 1787, Patersen arrived in St. Petersburg and placed an ad in the St. Petersburg Vedomosti newspaper, inviting those wishing to order paintings from him.

Here he worked in portrait and genre painting, but became famous for his city landscapes, which he created more than a hundred. 33 of them are painted in oil, the rest are watercolors and engravings, including those painted by him. Now they serve as a unique source of knowledge about the city of the 18th-19th centuries.

While working in St. Petersburg, he did not lose touch with Sweden. So from 1790 he began to regularly send his works to exhibitions at the Royal Academy of Arts in Stockholm, and in 1798 became a member of it. At the turn of the 18th-19th centuries, he created a series of ten views of the Neva embankments dedicated to Paul I. His works are kept in the Hermitage (the largest collection of the artist's works from among those created in St. Petersburg) and the Pushkin Museum.

The characteristic features of Pattersen's Petersburg landscapes are the choice of a foreground with a river or a canal, most of the sheet devoted to the sky, a well-drawn horizon line, gray-blue or golden tonality (for watercolors and painted graphic sheets). Almost all famous architectural monuments of the second half of the 18th century are represented in Pattersen's works.

(here you can download Patersen (a book with illustrations) as well as a bunch of other interesting books about St. Petersburg, including old editions with photos, -

CONSPIROLOGICAL INVESTIGATION

The main vector of critical research - the paintings are not construction, but the restoration of objects in the center of St. Petersburg

SLOOT

In general, there is something fake in the workers (it immediately "hit" the eye) that the four of them pull the stone with the help of the tension mechanism (THIS IS THEY WANT TO SAY THAT WITH SUCH MACARO, A HUGE STONE TOWN HAS BEEN BUILT IN A TWO DEN YEARS? Well, well … "FRESH FOOD..", as they say …)

But let's continue the analysis - not far away, in the thickets (in the foreground of the full picture, to the left of the center) there is still the same square block, and a round bar (supposedly for transporting - rolling such blocks) THIS FAKE 100% - sweat to the type of construction methods of the Egyptian pyramids, with a liesno (ochepyatka "according to Freud !!") of the official version of history.

WHAT IS "NON-TECHNOLOGICAL" HERE

And it is drawn that senseless, what is called - "on a sucker"! Four twist a vertically installed log, winding a cable on it, pulling the block for the sake of (where and why - from one empty place to another?) A round bar (2 pcs) is placed under the movable block, and then how will the block go? It is necessary that the beams (which are generally lying to the side) should be placed along the entire length of the movement to the place of transportation.

… or they can't move the block because it is "stuck" in the notch in the middle? At the same time, the situation is captured in dynamics (workers are making efforts, sort of like) The madhouse is shorter … The picture is for idiots (skuza me) If you look without thinking, it's quite normal. For believers..

Here, two gouges are chatting about something (one is sitting), meanwhile the stone has almost slid off the second bar - WHERE? IT IS NECESSARY THAT THE BAR WAS ALREADY BEARED FURTHER !!! (a foreman is needed here, with a "magic pendel") And then, it is drawn in such a way that the block in the center (the lower part of it) is punched out under the beam..

What's this? They pull exactly the soft pillow.. And if the block itself is of such a concave shape from the bottom - who put it in this way? So after all, a heavy block will not be able to move - the bar will drown in a depression, concavity, and the edges will fall on the surface of the earth, you will have to drag it!

Meanwhile, it is clear that from the front, the block is completely straight, and it was necessary to lay it with the curved side forward so that the block rolled along the bar, this flat surface!

They didn’t draw from life, they didn’t capture the real process - it was just that someone was sitting at home, in the studio, drawing “funny pictures” for the highest order (with believability without bothering much) then he was specifically framed (personally, I would not tolerate) Well, if Ben worked, then … alas Ben..

In all his paintings he has round bars, on which, supposedly, all the stones of St. Petersburg were "rolled" !!

HERE THE METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION ARE DESCRIBED, NOT MORE THAN THIS (they say, the stone city was built with a stick, a rope, and such a mother) PART OF THIS IS THE PURPOSE OF WRITING THE PICTURE (or even the whole epic)

CASE IS CLEAR THAT CASE IS DARK !!

But let's not rush to conclusions - it is possible that from the works of Ben himself, there is only "George in the Woods" (because the style is different specifically!) It’s painfully everything there is unnatural, artificially deliberate, written clearly in the middle of the 19th century (when the main cult massif of the Russian Empire was sculpted).. Everything is too correct there, "combed" - there is no breath, no life.. Despite everything is beautiful, of course..

The very fact of covering the territory of the captured places is more like a deliberate demonstration of the views of an allegedly existing city, in decoration and in perfect order

SUDDENLY looked at the dates "George in the Woods" - 1799, and there are paintings painted earlier, according to the specified date (the view of the Tauride Palace - 1797) which are identical to all the others, in terms of the style of writing, and earlier and later of the object under consideration ("George in the Woods")

That is - this picture stands out from all painted in the same style. More and more inclined to think that it is the work of different masters. Perhaps this is the only work of Ben Patersen.

If you approach from the other side - they say, allegedly, Patersen is everything, everything, all the pictures, and "Georg in the Woods" is not his picture, or fake.. Then the meaning is lost at all.. Why should this be made public? Remove it and that's all, to hell with it, so as not to get out of the same style!

Apparently the picture was "exposed" specifically (there are many copies, it is widely known in narrow circles, etc.), therefore, I had to create this epic, imitating the author's style (not very successfully) in order to refute the theme of the above-mentioned picture (destroyed, flooded, abandoned city)

IN GENERAL, I COUNT THREE DIFFERENT HANDS THERE, AT LEAST (from the entire array) OR THE AUTHOR WRITTEN SO UNSTABLE "swam", as they say, or maybe I was looking for my own handwriting, which also "could be" in principle..

Here again - very few people will notice, and who will not always think about WHY? Therefore, in principle, it is hidden rather reliably, taking into account the general state of society (consumption, sleep), it is not necessary for anyone for a hundred years, to dig in this direction.

In general, I think there is a specific mix of natural and fake, in which to understand more deeply, personally I have no opportunity, due to lack of specials. education and data access. My judgment is at the level of intuition (although it rarely lets me down)

MORE INTERESTING POINTS

Pay attention - a dirt road with right-hand traffic in both directions, and a sidewalk clearly separated by a dug-in stone.. Very interesting! Zamorochka, however.. The area of the porcelain factory - apparently such a saturated movement that it was necessary to specially mark the sidewalk - you can see the efforts of the traffic police of that time.. Anyway, somehow not in Russian.. More in Prussian - yes! (it is possible that the Prussians lived here at that time)

THIS IS ALSO THE TOPIC

If you make out what is chosen in the picture (outside the palace), then alas, again the picture is depressing for its unnaturalness (again, they did not draw from life) Some kind of working process is shown, not shaky-roll, "one and a half digger" something somnambulistic, they are odd, general complacency, relaxation, pacification.. How could such a city be built, at such a pace?

Either it's restoration work - then everything fits! The same can be seen in the rest of the paintings. And if there is restoration, then the city was built a long time ago, not by such workers, and not by such technical "means"

And finally, the joke - how some peoples display others

KANKAI IBUN

Illustration from the 11th Kankai Ibun scroll. The monument was drawn by a Japanese artist from the words of the interrogated sailors, nailed by shipwreck to the shores of Russia and many years later returned to Japan by the Russian embassy headed by N. P. Rezanov

====================================================================

ON POSOSHOK (with fresh eyes)

And now, let me present an alternative opinion (mine), the current one (2018-09-02) the post itself was written on September 22, 2017 at 16:10 (still in the Tver skete) about the painting "George in the forest"

AUGUST SHOES

Pay attention to the shoes of the august emperor (here are boots, and we have sandals) - another argument in favor of the fact that Ben painted the picture either from someone else's words, or whether it was not Ben at all - or the monument was different and stood in a different location. There are specific "neponyatushki" with the location - the river flows on the side, and next to the monument (in fact, the river is right in front, and at a decent distance from..)

…. and we have sandals - written from other people's pictures or words

It looks like the "Emperror" is wearing the thinnest nylon socks that exactly follow all the contours of the leg - down to the smallest anatomical details

But at the same time equipped with a sole and heels (taken from here -

CHARACTER

What can you say about him? (my opinion) This is an allegorical image of a certain representative of the "heavenly office" - a local god in charge of natural resources (this is symbolized by the water flowing out of his pot, feeding the flood) This is also emphasized by his clothes, or rather their absence (barely covered with a cut of tissue of the thighs) and head dress (a wreath of fresh leaves, herbs) And also, a certain instrument that resembles an email. bass guitar (neck without tuning pegs) maybe this is such an original paddle, or a bat, for playing ball.. As you can see - the god, having screwed up pretty much, sat down to rest from "good deeds", to admire his work -

AND HE SEEN THAT IT'S GOOD

===========================================

LET'S SUMMER - IN GENERAL AND IN GENERAL:

ALLEGORY

The first thought is that this allegorical picture, symbolizing the intervention of the forces of nature in the fate of the city, has no concrete connection to reality! They wrote it not from nature, but from words (from donkeys)) Perhaps a redrawing from other images of the sculpture (like the Japanese Kankai Ibun)

SYMBOLISM

On the other hand, the picture symbolizes the long abandonment of the city (or monument) as a result of the flood (tall trees), but it takes 70 years for them to grow - they would not have had so much time (according to the version of off. X / Ztoria) Since the founding of the city (1703) maybe, but (according to X / Ztoria, again) from the date of installation of the monument, in 1782. not very much (the picture was painted already in 1799), therefore, it also does not fit with the existing official X / Ztoric reality.

HERITAGE OF AN ANCIENT PAST

MAYBE - a natural picture (a monument among the forests is a legacy of the ancient past) but later redrawn (the god was drawn, for an allegorical interpretation) Again - round bars (!!!) obsessively stick into the eyes (they say, all construction equipment) And I bow down to this latest version! And the rest of Ben P.'s paintings (as already noted) are written in a completely different style, with a different hand. Perhaps all this, the later arrangement (of the software content pictures) of the manufacturers of the "new version" of history, maintaining the above version for.

What do you think? YOU DECIDE!!! Form your opinion - it is the most correct (at the moment of your development)

In any case, it is reliable to assert that it is hardly correct, one can only assume this or that.

ALL GOOD, AND SEE NEW MEETINGS! (any knowledge is an intermediate result of infinite knowledge of the universe)

read more about Petersburg - A useless, irreplaceable city or TRACES OF A GLOBAL EMPIRE on the NEVA SHORES / Is Petersburg the most Russian of all non-Russian, or the most non-Russian of all Russian cities? / TRAGICOMEDiIA in TWO PARTS (stsylko -