Three unique ways of development of civilization

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

The historical process does not go on by itself. He is controllable. An important nuance of this governance is that a crowd-elite system has long been supported in society.

The scheme of crowd-elitism.

The whole society, depending on access to knowledge, is divided into three main groups.

1. Crowd- owners of fragmentary knowledge that changes under the pressure of the environment or control action. For example, through authorities: scientists, stars, athletes, politicians, etc.

Example:

Creation of a false information module for the crowd.

The crowd is trained to build its life based on the opinion of authorities and experts.

In reality, the picture looks like this:

1972 year(GOST 18300-72): "Ethyl alcohol is a highly flammable, colorless liquid with a characteristic odor, belongs to strong drugs that cause first excitement and then paralysis of the nervous system. "

What is the name of a person who uses drugs? And is it possible to be a culturally addicted addict, only on holidays? Why are these obviousthings that can be understood simply by observing the world around you, its laws and your own body - are not obvious to most people?

We think everyone understands. Although in this place many people now turn on stereotypes of thinking and they will begin to prove that this is their choice, this is a whole culture and in general it is useful, in small doses.

So we can offer only in addition to ethanol to use beaver urine. Also in small doses. And better from beavers of elite breeds. They say it contains many vitamins, dilates blood vessels and relieves stress - British scientists have proven.

2. "Elite"- have a lot of knowledge. Most often they are well educated in a narrow field of activity: the military "elite", the financial "elite", the political "elite", etc., but due to the kaleidoscopic worldview they are not able to combine knowledge into a holistic perception of Life.

Physics - physics, lyrics - lyrics.

3. System hosts- holders of a holistic, mosaic worldview, who have access to the entire volume of information accumulated by mankind.

The plowman's son is a plowman. The son of a king is a king. Who rules the kings?

The stability of the system is based on the fact that both the crowd and the “elite”, in essence, are representatives of the same group. Therefore, we always use the word "elite" in quotation marks, since it is not. The only difference is that the "elite" are allowed to take a privileged place in the social pyramid to act as overseers and drivers for the rest of the crowd.

But neither the crowd nor the "elite" are capable of independently developing information modules and forming a worldview. In view of this, both those and others always act according to the programmed laws of the system and are always predictable for the subject of control - the owners.

From time to time, tools need to be sharpened. After the “elite” crawls and degrades, the subject of management gives it up to be torn apart by the crowd.

The "elites" are working.

After that, a new "elite" emerges. But she, too, is doomed to repeat the fate of her predecessors, since their morality remains within the bounds of the crowd-elite ethics.

There are two ways to renew the “elite”

1. Cutting off the “elite” from below is a revolution.

2. The circumcision of the "elite" from above - this is 37 years, the processes of which are still being hanged by the crowd and the "elite" on Stalin. The crowd does not see managerial maneuvers, and it is beneficial for the “elite” to continue to maintain this misunderstanding, which allows them to mold a guilty person out of one person.

The first leaders of the GULAG.

There is one more option. But it goes beyond the crowd-elite system. This is the expansion of the management base to the scale of the entire society (opening up access to knowledge), opening up social lifts (the ability to take on a greater level of responsibility in terms of managerial competence) and monitoring compliance with the positions held, regardless of origin or involvement in a particular clan.

What option will be in Russia?

Our "elite" is ruled by the liberal clans of the United States. They are sentenced to liquidation by the subject of management, since the "capitalism beacon" has fulfilled its tasks and it is no longer advisable to keep this insatiable toolkit, the appetites of which endanger the entire system. This is what Trump is doing.

But in Russia the current system of power is needed by the subject of management, since the subject of management cannot afford to lose control of the world processes at the time of confrontation and the possible transfer of the center of concentration of management from the United States to China.

Representative of the liberal clans of Russia.

The trouble is that of the three options for changing the "elite", only the third option - replacing managers with people from the "common people" - breaks the vicious circle:

• solving national problems
• where are the people and where am I
• all the people left for me
• redneck people who have no right to complain
• the people put the "elite" on a pitchfork"

and again …

But the third option involves the development of the crowd of knowledge on the management of social supersystems, as a result of which the crowd ceases to be a crowd and becomes a people.

Which path do you want to take?