Prophecies as a way to control the fate of civilization

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2024-01-07 16:23

The future always beckons with its uncertainty. And as Pushkin wrote, "the human mind … is not a prophet, but a guessing one, it sees the general course of things and can deduce from it deep assumptions, often justified by time …" then the future in his assumptions.

But with all the intelligence of the individual, as Alexander Sergeevich argued, "it is impossible for him to foresee a case - a powerful, instant instrument of providence …." Or is it sometimes "given"? Although "there is no prophet in our Fatherland"?

And Vladimir Putin, when asked what gift he would like to have, answered:

"By the gift of foresight."

When it comes to the future, concepts such as prophecy, prediction or forecast emerge, and also, sometimes, it comes to programming the future. Do we understand well the difference between these concepts? Do we see well the phenomena indicated by these words? This is what our article is about.

Mura in the life of society

The academic science of modern society is divided into two components: the exact (natural) sciences and the humanities. The basic difference is the issue of metrological consistency of each of the groups and individual disciplines. Metrology implies the presence of well-defined measurescharacteristics, both agreed in the community of scientists, and corresponding to Life as a whole (society and the Universe).

In the humanitarian fields, metrological consistency is not given the same importance as in technical ones, because verification is hampered by the great subjectivity of researchers. In technical areas, everything is simple - I measured and tested, but in the humanitarian areas the concept of measure is not developed so deeply.

All matter is somehow ordered and measured - one relative to the other, that is, it has a certain measure. And everything has certain images or information, such as color, taste, smell and other qualities that can be displayed from one material object to another. And if we put it in terms of the most general philosophical categories, then:

• there is something that affects something similar to him, changing his state, his image is matter;

• there is something that objectively exists, but not material, that is transmitted in the process of this interaction, which changes the state of matter - reflection - from one material carrier to another and does not lose its objective quality when changing the material carrier - this is informationor, in Russian - images: “There is no thing without an image” - VI Dal's Dictionary;

• and there is still something, also intangible, that determines various qualities of information display - sensitivity threshold, coding system, frequency range, carrier wave polarization, etc. - these are all private measuresdistinguishing parameters.

And this trinity: matter, information, measure (through ѣ - "yat": mѣra) - exists in the inextricable connection of its components with each other, forming a trinity. And each of these constituent integral objects of the Universe, we can, being ourselves objects of the same Universe, perceive: feel the materiality of objects, read from them their information characteristics and distinguish between different qualities of objects, their dimensional characteristics. And for this we have a whole set of tools:

• hearing;
• vision;
• taste;
• sense of smell;
• touch;

- called “feelings” of a person, along with which in different cultures such feelings as “sense of intuition”, “sense of conscience” and “sense of proportion” are preserved and used! Let's talk about the latter in more detail.

Feeling of Muraallows us to measure some objects with others, to feel the difference between them. We can do this because the surrounding Universe is in a certain way measured:

« Mara is in everything, and everything is in the world. Thanks to this property of mѣra, the world is complete and complete. Falling out of the water - death »

Each process and object is commensurate with others, and in the limit - a certain Universal world the entire Universe is measured.

Mѣra is a kind of matrix of possible states and transformations of matter, storing information not only about all past processes in which the object participated, but also about the statistically predetermined direction of the objectively possible course of processes, that is, about what can happen to the object in the future …

And the Universe as a whole has its own Universal world - a kind of "multivariate scenario of the Universe being."

It statistically predetermines the ordering of private material structures (their information capacity) and the ways of their change when information is absorbed from the outside and when information is lost (of course, carried by matter). The resulting orderliness of objects and changes in this orderliness can be accompanied by a violation of ideal proportionality, harmony of both individual fragments of the structure, and its hierarchy as a whole.

The loss of proportionality is degradation, but in relation to the enveloping structures and systems that encompass a multitude of structures, the degradation of some of their particular fragments can be the development of the structure (system) as a whole.

This is how a flower bud travels a path: a bud, a bud, a flower, a fruit, a seed, a plant: and the degradation of elements is inseparable from the development of the system as a whole and its encompassing (in this sense, hierarchically higher) systems.

Mura in relation to information is a kind of code. And information (in Russian "image") without a material medium is not transmitted, not perceived.

The sense of the world of a person, thus, on the one hand, allows you to feel the holographic nature of the world (that same Universal world) on the basis of all the above feelings and not only them (sight, hearing, smell, touch, conscience, love, intuition, fear, shame, resentment, humor, etc.), and on the other hand, it is an integral, unique feeling, which, in essence, is a means of perceiving the objective world around us.

The sense of peace when applied to different processes, like other human senses, can be trained.

See how Lars Andersen developed the ability to balance his movements, the flight of arrows and the movement of targets, to restore how many could shoot in the days when the bow was one of the main weapons of ranged combat.

In the same way, people developed their other senses, as, for example, Ernst Mach, who studied sound phenomena and refined his hearing so much that he could not go to concerts, because he heard the slightest falseness of the musicians. Our senses can be very sharp, for example, like the vision of Veronica Seider, who is able to see the face of the oncoming person at a distance of 1.6 km.

One of the properties of the sense of peace is the perception and comparison of the probabilistic predetermines of various options for the future and their assessments (this will be discussed later in the article).

It is on the basis of the sense of peace that all kinds of forecasts and predictions are made, the quality and accuracy of which also depends on the integrity, detail of the picture of the world. It must be said that the sense of peace cannot be opposed to the acquired knowledge, just as other human senses (sight, hearing, etc.) are not opposed to knowledge.

For a holistic and high-quality forecast, of course, it is necessary to have knowledge and skills, to be interested in and cognize the world (including the religious component of life), to know and relate to the objective laws that life is subject to, but more importantly - to use the sense of peace, to feel interconnectedness with its help all objects of the Universe.

A good prediction can be given by a person without any special knowledge, but who has developed a sense of the world.

What is prediction?

Guessing the future is, in essence, the disclosure of a certain private dimension of a certain process, of how it will change in the future within the framework of the Universal universe. Therefore, guessing can be conditionally divided into two categories:

• creative (leading processes to harmony with the Universal world and, accordingly, the direction of development of the Universe)
• and destructive (when processes are chaotic or looped, going against the direction of the Universe as a whole).

In relation to any version of the future that has a certain image, a person can assess not only its probability, but also probabilistic predetermination, understood as an estimate of the extent of the possible, equal to the probability of "spontaneous" realization (based on the previous self-government and without outside interference), multiplied by a measure the potential of the manager's personality.

Although the latter value is precisely known to God alone (for atheists, it is available at the hierarchically highest level of control of the Universe), nevertheless, social practice shows that there are people under whose control any undertaking will perish, and there are people under whose control it will be accomplished. successfully seemingly impossible:

"Cadres decide everything" - J. V. Stalin

Since any control is based on sufficient predictability of the behavior of the system under the influence of:

• environmental factors on it;
• internal changes in herself;
• management, as such,

as a result of this, society somehow reacts to information of a predictive nature. Therefore, the very fact of any forecast - and even more so the spread of predictive information in society - changes the era of uncertainties that preceded it in the course of events, that is, the probabilities and probabilistic predeterminations within the limits allowed by their Higher predetermination from the encompassing levels. Accordingly, the announcement of a forecast is always a managerial action that can be aimed either at creation or at destruction.

In the current crowd-"elite" culture (there is a crowd and there is a heterogeneous "elite", which can also be attributed to the crowd, only more knowledgeable in some issues) forecasts, messages from those who were appointed "prophets", and messages from real prophets from the past were often used for programming crowds and societies of mankind that have not developed their own sense of serenity.

Prophecies, predictions, programming: how to distinguish and how to react

Before dealing with the question of how to react to various predictions, prophecies, you must first learn to distinguish between them. Therefore, let's define the terms.

So, there are three aspects of statements about the future (predictions), these are prophecies, predictions and programming. Let's start with the latter. Unlike predictions and prophecies, where the possible scenario of the future, in programming it is announced immediately the final this script.

And what processes will lead to this ending, we have to conjecture ourselves. For example, a fortune teller said: you will live a long time. Why will I live long? A person has good genetics, will he lead a healthy lifestyle, will he live in an ecologically clean area, will he carry out activities necessary for society and will long summers be bestowed from Above?

The reason is not clear, therefore it is difficult to react, choose a line of behavior in life, especially if a negative ending is announced. It must be said that programming, especially in the case when a negative ending is announced, increases the likelihood of this event occurring.

Let's take the following story as an example.

“There was a grandmother living in the village - a fortune teller. She guessed that there would be hunger. Spring came. The peasants do not plow or sow. Indeed, why waste energy on this, if there will still be hunger. Autumn. The surrounding villages have an unprecedented harvest. And in this one - hunger begins. Morality. The grandma announced the final of the script, without announcing the reasons that would lead to this. That is, I programmed the villagers for hunger."

Forecasts and prophecies are announced scenario, which can lead to some kind of ending. And they provide an opportunity to rethink behavior so that the announced forecast does not come true. In other words, they reduce the probabilistic predetermination of the implementation of a negative option.

Prophecieshave as their source hierarchically higher levels of control in relation to humanity, that is, they can come from the collective psyche (in another terminology - egregors), or from God (for atheists - from the highest comprehensive level of control).

Forecasts, for the most part, are the fruit of the reasoning of the person himself. And just like forecasts, prophecies are announced by people, therefore it is difficult to discern the source of their origin. We think that a person who has met a forecast or a prophecy should, on the basis of his existing worldview, a sense of severity and conscience, as a universal “appraiser”, determine its source. But it is not even the source itself that is important, but information about the future, which has been made public and has become the property of the human psyche (people).

Information is objective and not pointless. And it is given in order to draw attention to the processes in which a person (or society) participates, to rethink them, and to make a decision that will avoid undesirable consequences.

When making decisions that can help avoid undesirable consequences, it is very important to maintain a good mood for business, not to fall into nihilism and other forms of well-intentioned or social idiocy! (about this - one of our next articles) This also applies to the announcement of the forecast, which otherwise will be a direct implication of trouble, both for the one who makes the forecast, and for those in respect of whom and to whom the forecast is given.

The point is that the enclosing systems close feedbacks on everyone who deviates to one degree or another from the path determined by the enclosing system as optimal in order to help the deviant see his mistakes. Therefore, the forecast, like any performed action, given without love and a good emotional-semantic structure, will be defective to one degree or another, or everything that was spoken out as a negative part of the script will come true.

The most famous prophets include such people as: Adam, Moses, Isaiah, Buddha, Jesus, Muhammad, etc.

It is believed that in the religions and cults associated with them, they carried Revelations from Above, and in historically established Christianity, Jesus was generally endowed with the status and properties of God. By modifying and altering the prophecies or the status of the prophet, it is possible to program the behavior of people, which also applies to the second priority of generalized controls / weapons (this issue will be discussed below in the article), and, directly, to matrix control, which is described in more detail in the article “Matrix control - it's time to master the magic!"

Also in the cultures of different peoples there were institutions of oracles (seers and soothsayers) who issued a forecast, and groups of people who interpreted it! This topic is discussed in detail in the article "The Delphic Oracle - Mass Management Technology".

In different eras, this institution had different formats: from mystical rituals and complex structures to one person or even an octopus, which has access to television screens in all countries.

Octopus is the "predictor" of the 2010 World Cup matches, which was promoted in the media as a joke.

Most of the prophecies contain the theme of disasters and catastrophes.

On the one hand, it is precisely negative feedbacks that are important in managing an object or process; on the other hand, it is negative predictions that cause the greatest range of emotions, on the basis of which the programming of people and the manipulation (management in self-serving interests) of them can be based.

Society and the common man in the majority either mindlessly believes, or completely rejects all sorts of forecasts, horoscopes, practices, but does not treat these phenomena and processes associated with them with meaningful responsibility, and therefore does not seek to understand the mechanism and essence of manipulation and programming personality, people and society, thereby leaving in the future opportunities for these very manipulations and control from the outside.

A bit of probability theory

The section of control theory, which deals with forecasting as a choice of the only option for the future, contains a lot of materials that are based on the theory of probability (measures of uncertainty) and statistics.

And although this is justified, not everyone knows the theory of probability in relation to Life, so let's try to put all of the above, as they say, “on our fingers”.

So the probability of an offensive the future in general is equal to one. And this is logical, because some future will surely come. It turns out that the sum of the probabilities of all future options is equal to one.

Let's say we see three options for the future. And let our subjective assessment of the probability of their occurrence look like this:

1. Negative scenario. The probability of occurrence is 0.4.
2. Normal scenario. The probability of occurrence is 0.35.
3. Positive scenario. The probability of occurrence is 0.25.

In sum, they just give one. But now let's impose on this situation the manager's mistakes, because he may incorrectly assess the probability of events occurring, and some options may fall out of his field of vision. Let the objectively same situation look like this:

1. A very negative scenario. The probability of occurrence is 0.1
2. Negative scenario. The probability of occurrence is 0.35
3. Normal scenario. The probability of occurrence is 0.25
4. Positive scenario. Probability of occurrence 0.2
5. A very positive scenario. The probability of occurrence is 0.1

As you can see, our imaginary manager did not quite accurately assess the probabilities of the scenarios, and also two extreme options dropped out of his field of vision. Subsequently, if a very negative scenario is implemented, everyone will say: a disaster, and if it is very positive, they will say: a miracle. In fact, there was no miracle or catastrophe, it was just that some options that were objectively possible dropped out of consideration.

Now let's figure out the numbers that indicate the probability of the onset of one or another variant of the future. They represent the likelihood self-fulfillment these options, if all processes go as they went before. Specific human activities can increase or decrease the likelihood of any option.

And the amount by which this very figure, denoting the probability, increases or decreases, depends on the personality of the manager. Again, we recall the expression "Cadres decide everything."

Thus, any of the objectively possible options for the future is feasible, you just need to correctly assess it and apply the required amount of effort.

There is also such a moment: even the most unlikely scenario can come true if it is supported from Above. And this has happened more than once in history.

The fact is that in the Universe there are objective, encompassing processes that lead everything embedded in them to the qualities of harmony, or, to put it in other words, to the objectively best option. If a person sees such the best, but unlikely option, and makes efforts to implement it, he will be provided with support from Above (from the level of the encompassing processes), and the chances of success will increase many times over.

Announcement of the forecast as an act of management

Now let us consider the very technology of controlling the course of events in a crowd-"elite" system through knowledge of the laws of psychology and sociology through the announcement of certain predictions. This social engineering is done in two stages.

First stage

This is the announcement of the forecast itself. Usually, authority is used for this. And this authority first needs to be grown, promoted, therefore, several different authorities are being promoted at once, working in different topics. Ideally, the society has a system of automatic promotion of authorities, and in a crowd-"elite" society, crowd control is always carried out according to the principle outlined by V. G. Belinisky:

"A crowd is a gathering of people who live according to tradition and reason according to authority."

Then, you need to familiarize as many people as possible with this forecast. Nowadays, social networks are used for this, special sites for those who like to delve into forecasts, television programs in which both the forecast itself is discussed and the authority that announced it is being promoted.

At this stage, a certain image of the future is laid in the psyche of people. It is complemented by as many details as possible. And the unconscious of people itself forms a possible scenario for the transition to such a future.

Second phase

In the second step, this script needs to be activated. They activate it by showing some images through painting, cinema, the media, playing the role of synchronizers of unconscious collective activity, since the density of information transmitted in images is several times higher than the density of information transmitted in vocabulary.

When hundreds of thousands of viewers or newspaper readers automatically view pictures, movie posters, something like a closure of the psyche through the informational (figurative) component of the script into its dimensional component and embedding of the individual psyche, if it corresponds to the role in the script, into the collective psyche performing it as a whole …

And vice versa, some scenario can mature in the unconscious of society and splash out in the form of images in the information field of society. So, for example, long before the events of September 11, the matrix of these events was formed and splashed out into the culture of society.

People are connected to the implementation of the scenario and then the process of auto-synchronization can begin in order to transfer the whole society into the mode of implementation of the announced scenario.

It must be understood that most of the actions aimed at implementing the forecast are performed by people unconsciously, that is, consciousness does not take part in the comprehension and assessment of the individual's actions.

For the most part, realizing the scenario, people "ride" on their instincts and automatisms, not much different from remotely controlled robots or stimulated by animal stimuli.

And the scenario of "forecast", flickering with images from the information field of society, acts as a program and a stimulator of unconscious actions. Accordingly, it is more beneficial for managing social processes in such a way that a larger number of people are in states of mind that are similar in structure to animals or biorobots.

One more point should be noted. The more global the scenario announced in the forecast, the easier it is to implement it. For example, if you announce the forecast of a plane crash, then only a few dozen people will be involved in the actual implementation, among them there may not be the required number of key performers with the required state of mind.

But if you announce the forecast of the death of an entire empire, then several tens of millions of performers are more likely to be found.

How will it look in practice? Let's say the death of an empire has been announced. The scenario is embedded in the psyche of its inhabitants, the stage of launching the program has begun. The news reports that everything went wrong, everything is crumbling, people realize that the collapse of the country in which they live has begun.

What will the thoughtless ordinary people, the performers of this scenario, do? They will decide that everything is bad, there is no need to build houses, repair infrastructure, open new factories, etc. So the empire will gradually come to naught. Everything is the same as with the harvest and the grandmother.

Forecasting is the second priority of the OSU

Everything that was said in the previous sections of the article is in one way or another related to management in the broadest sense (management of countries and peoples, management of groups of people by interests, as well as management of oneself in conditions of external management) and mainly with the 2nd priority of generalized means control (OSU), with chrono- or matrix-algorithmic.

Management is always an informational process; the result of its management depends on how adequate the information is, how competently it is ordered, and how the subject has mastered it. When using controls within one social system, these are generalized controls for it.

And when they are applied by one social system in relation to another, when the concepts of management in them do not coincide, this is a generalized weapon; or - means of supporting self-government in another social system, in the absence of conceptual incompatibility of management in them.

It should also be said that most often the entire range of generalized controls / weapons acts jointly in a hybrid complex (hence the appearance of the term "hybrid wars").

However, relying on the sense of peace and outlook, highlighting the characteristic features of the process, it is possible to single out the dominant, which will determine to which priority of the OCU the process of interest should be attributed.

Having mastered this methodology, one can see the direction and tendencies of the processes, which will help to make a correct forecast and realize the best of its objectively possible outcomes …