Digging law and Cossack self-government

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Once upon a time, there was a COPNE LAW throughout all of Russia, but gradually the powers that be changed it, brought it into line with Western norms (Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth (Polish) law, as well as Magdeburg law for large cities), which protected the power of landowners.

In many areas, the Russian order was replaced by the Western, non-Russian, anti-Russian and remained only to some extent within the rural communities, and in the territories of the Cossack troops - the Cossack self-government.

COSSACK SELF-GOVERNMENT differed from state administration in other territories. Cossacks in circles themselves chose chieftains up to the chieftains of the army: the head, the koshevoy - the treasurer, the marching - the chief of the militia (the squad was organized from the entire male population), the board, judges - i.e. the vertical of management was built from BOTTOM UP, like a PYRAMID growing out of the people, relying on them, providing constant two-way communication with the population.

In other places, the tsarist officials were appointed from TOP TO DOWN. This small, but fundamental difference determined the behavior and meaning of the work of each individual manager (as well as the efficiency of the system as a whole): if the leader is chosen and removed by the people, then he works for the good of the people; if he is appointed and removed from above, then he accepts instructions from there, and he does not care about the rest.

The advantages of self-government also include the fact that with it there is no need to write complaints to the chief's chiefs and in lengthy proceedings. In the case of rats, some kind of misconduct, the electors, without waiting for the end of their terms of office, gather in a new way, remove the culprit and punish right there. Awareness of the inevitability of punishment disciplines the servants of the people.

Under self-government, the people choose the best from among their own people, from those whom they know personally, and not from party lists. Self-government elections are aimed at uniting the people in identifying and nominating the most worthy candidate from among their ranks. In contrast to this system, elections based on party lists are aimed at dividing and deceiving the people.

In self-government, rights and responsibilities go hand in hand. Only those who are responsible for the maintenance of the management system and are responsible for the decisions made, up to the answer with property or with weapons in their hands, have the right to elect and vote. Cossacks voted in circles; on the hunt - householders who, in addition to property, had a permanent settlement. What the violation of the principle of personal responsibility leads to was remarkably demonstrated in Soviet times during the period of the introduction of elective directors, when state employees and freeloaders who were not personally responsible for anything and did not vote in a crowd against the demanding old directors, replaced them with democratic, albeit illiterate promising directors, and neither for which and personally not responsible for anything. If these workers were responsible for the wrong choice with something personally or were self-supporting and their welfare depended not on the state. budget, and from the achieved labor success - the results of the election would be different.

The system of people's self-government in Russia before the appearance of the tsars developed over many millennia; it was 7208 from the Creation of the world, when Peter 1 introduced 1700 from the birth of Christ according to the Julian calendar (314 years ago).

The system of tsarism, brought from the west, existed in Russia for only a few hundred years, but managed to show its depravity in full. The first tsar was Ivan the Terrible (1547-1584). When the tsar is wonderful - the tsarist power works for the state, allows concentrating the available resources on solving the problems facing the people. But such a king is a rare exception to the rule. History has shown that it is worth climbing the throne for some weasel - and the system does not work, it becomes anti-popular, anti-state: usurpation, trade in positions, state resources, lands, providing relatives and pets … (diseases of irresponsibility inherent in all types of tsarism). The people paid dearly for the acceptance of tsarist power. Appointed by the king FROM TOP DOWN, the eternally hungry, greedy bureaucratic army, respectively, was responsible to him, and not to the people; fakirs for an hour sought to ensure their personal interests at the expense of the population, as well as to organize conveniences for their administration. Over time, the elected military chieftains were replaced by orders. The pressure on the Cossacks continued until the February Revolution. Officials sawed through the budget and divided government orders, and ordinary people struggled with the hardships caused by the war, landlessness, unemployment … The situation was becoming intolerable. Tsarism, as a system of government, has completely outlived itself at that time and not only in our country.

Tsarism buried itself by its actions, itself demonstrated its complete inconsistency and even harmfulness to the population:

When building the power vertical from TOP DOWN, there was no feedback with the people, the managers did not care about the interests, traditions, history of the Russian nation, state interests (rare exceptions only confirmed the rule), As soon as the pro-Polish or pro-German managers climbed upstairs, they immediately began polonization or Germanization, depending on which is closer and dearer;

· Appointed officials provided preferences to their affiliated structures and relatives, regardless of the aspirations of local residents;

· Over the centuries, tsarism disfigured the logic and mentality of the Russian people, introducing mottos such as: there is no power not from God, the boss is always right; although in reality "there is no power if it is not from God," the people are primary, and not the leader and the leader is only the executor of the will of the people, the source of power; those. tsarism tried to break the people's self-consciousness, turning concepts upside down, educating the people in obedience, in slavery, declaring any actions of the rulers to be good and legal, even if they were not good for the people, · When building a vertical of power FROM TOP AND DOWN, its support is not the people, but the ruler; it turns out, as it were, a garland torn from the people on a pendant and it is enough to knock one element out of its fastening, destroy one link, so that the entire management structure collapses, the flawedness of such a system was confirmed by every coup, when the people were indifferent and even joyful retribution to the overthrown tyrants, · An unnatural management system eventually led to the destruction of the Russian state itself - the central link was removed and everything fell apart.

the first thought - they probably don't know history at all, they don't understand that the tsar, the general secretary, the president are essentially the same thing, only the names are different, if you want tsarism, look around - this is it; and … do you want a good king? so it will not be, officials slow down the good on the distant lines, so that they do not interfere with stealing, and this is fundamentally, the system is as follows: it is always easier to take one person under control than the whole people;

second thought - probably someone is paying them.

The Provisional Government, having replaced the autocrat, did not interfere with the revival of the people's self-government. The Cossacks made circles, atamans and boards were elected. The building of state administration began, as it should be, from BOTTOM UP, the country was moving towards the Constituent Assembly. Unfortunately, the Provisional Government did not make proper efforts to maintain the status quo and order until the Constituent Assembly was held, did not eliminate the dual power, did not disperse the Bolshevik Soviets that were striving for power. It was busy - sawing budgets, dividing posts from TOP TO DOWN.

But the Bolsheviks staged the October coup. They dashed like a mad dog in front of the locomotive and seized control, seized administrations, arsenals, banks, warehouses, communications, newspapers in settlements. After the civilian, the Bolsheviks dominated the soviets until the mid-80s (a man with a gun still loomed behind the Leninists and was the main support of the regime, continuing to intimidate the population with weapons and repression). In reality, the "Soviets" system was a continuation of the tsarist system of government and served as a fig leaf on the body of the CPSU: appointments to all positions were traditionally carried out through the Kremlin (party), FROM TOP AND DOWN. By this time, the nomenclature was overgrown with relatives, and a bickering began for places and power between them. The contradictions that have arisen between the clans, between the satisfaction of growing needs and the existing system of production are the logical completion of the construction of an incorrect system of government and state structure. It took the Bolsheviks only a few decades to reach the finale, which took the tsars several centuries. However, by the end of the "Soviet" power, as a result of the elimination of the monopoly of the CPSU, the introduction of a multi-party system and the possibility of self-nomination, the people began to really regain power in the local Soviets and in the Supreme Soviet. An attempt was made to organize elections for the administration by labor collectives. Feeling a threat, the anti-popular management structure itself removed the connecting link and destroyed the state, retaining its dominant position on its fragments.

The putsch and the liquidation of the USSR passed like clockwork. Democratic liberals, having kicked out the communists, climbed into their chairs, but the system of building the administrative vertical remained the same: FROM TOP TO DOWN. In reality, these democratic liberals are the heirs of the Bolsheviks both in terms of the system of government, and often in the literal sense, they are their own grandchildren and nephews, who, as always, are unable to do anything except ensure their personal interests at the expense of the people. As a result of mismanagement of the economy, opportunities for the welfare of top managers have diminished. The shortage of places in the sun - what the Bolsheviks were pursuing for seven decades, the current regime reached in twenty years. We see redistributions and scandals, the spiral of development is steeper and steeper - managers are in search. Crafty managers can call themselves patriots, doves of peace, internationalists, fathers of the Kremlin army, Cossacks of the Spasskaya Tower … anyone, just to stay afloat. Therefore, if tomorrow some new advertised parties and glamor flashes in the media before our eyes, and behind them the old system FROM TOP DOWN, and not people's self-government BOTTOM UP, then we don't need to swim - in front of us are all the same old acquaintances trying to stay on our neck.

Conclusions:

1 Tsarism, Bolshevism ("Soviet" power "), the presidency are different wrappers of the same system of government: seizing power and building a power vertical from TOP AND DOWN to ensure their group interests at the expense of the people and to suppress the people.

Self-government is an order based on the direct expression of the will of the people, building the management structure independently from BOTTOM UP. Self-government existed long before the tsars - since the inception of mankind, under tsarism, it was preserved in the territories of the Cossack troops and within rural communities, revived in the territories liberated from the occupiers and at the end of the "Soviet" power, when the Bolsheviks began to lose leading positions in the soviets.

The anti-people system FROM TOP AND DOWN and the system of people's self-government from BOTTOM UP were always in contradiction.

It is necessary to clearly understand: Building a management vertical from BOTTOM UP is a system of people's self-government. Building a vertical of command FROM TOP DOWN is an anti-people system, no matter what clothes it dresses in, what names it calls.

2. The Bolsheviks staged a coup not against the tsar (the tsar had already "renounced" the throne by that time) and not against tsarism as a system of government. meeting)

3. The civil war was not between Bolshevism and tsarism, but between the Bolsheviks (the successors of the tsarist system of government) and the people who did not want to submit to the new (old) system, advocating the Constituent Assembly and people's self-government - between the two systems.

4. The main direction in the development of society is not participation in party games, not changing sewn for soap, not hysteria around some informational reasons, but the restoration of Russian order and people's self-government in the localities.

Author: Andrey Vitalievich Rodionov