Veto onomastics in history

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

“I take away to the outcast villages, I take away through the eternal groan, I am taking them to the lost generations”…

(Dante "Hell" Song 3)

All Russian historiography until the 19th century proceeds from the Kiev Synopsis, the content of which is dominated by two tendencies: Orthodox (baptism) and national (Battle of Kulikovo), here historians added a third, state-monarchical. "Synopsis" weakly expressed the influence of the Moscow autocracy, but historians from the XIV-XV centuries were completely under the spell of the Moscow state idea.

All four major researchers of this century, Tatishchev, Shcherbatov, Boltin, Lomonosov, are people with official positions, high-ranking officials known to the government and, on its behalf, studying Russian history. It was this circumstance that put its own distinct and definite stamp on their work and the way they thought: they were typical representatives of official influences and a reflection of the state spirit of the times. The enormous dependence of all literature on the church censorship that dominated Russia should never be overlooked.

Historians-contemporaries of Karamzin (Bantysh-Kamensky, Stroyev, Kalaydovich, Vostokov, Metropolitan Eugene and others) believed that it was too early to write the complete history of Russia until the necessary sources were collected, purified and published. But their works and many researchers of history and antiquity, more essentially fruitful and respectable, seemed to be drowned in the rays of the recognized "luminaries" of history.

The entire history of mankind seems to have surfaced simultaneously with Christianity, and pre-Christian history is interpreted only under the influence of biblical mythology. Fictitious names of peoples are combined with biblical legends of the origin of mankind, from which traces of the division of mankind into races remained in the "solid" works. Deliberately or more compilationally, all this is multiplying and many historians have tried to raise it, writing various theories of the origin of these peoples, they selected suitable chronicle texts of dubious origin and created various theories that do not have solid foundations and, as hypotheses, entail endless disputes.

The two main creators of history are nature and man. The whole history is made up of the interaction of nature and man, a monistic worldview based only on biblical mythology is not applicable in practice.

“Know thyself” - reads the inscription of the Delphic temple. This truth is realized by everyone, and among all peoples we see the desire for a complete and comprehensive study of their present and past: what was once considered a sign of scholarship or individuals, is now becoming a common property. Historical, statistical, ethnographic facts are constantly cited in conversations: they support and refute all judgments.

In historiography, a mass of inaccurate information is spread, often adorned with the imagination of the authors themselves, the compilation of inaccurate chronicles with distorted geographical names and nationalities is full of history. All this leads to the greatest misconceptions both for historians and for the reader. The geological map of Central Asia was a fertile area for exposing falsified names in onomastics.

For example: the word "Turan" in one of the Central Asian languages is translated as "abode", the root of the word - "tour" is translated in the Turanian languages as "stop, rise, place". I specifically use the word "Turan", which is historically fair and legal! The word "Turkestan" and "Turkisms …" were introduced in the historical literature at the beginning of the 19th century, the term is not quite accurately established (artificially introduced innuendo) and is used at the beginning by scientists (Humboldt, Richtofen, Reklu), although the true autochthons on the territory of Central Asia are peoples still inhabiting this area.

The two main rivers of Central Asia are repeated in historical annals as: "Yak-sart" and "Oxus", the mythological campaign of Alexander the Great is supported by Greek historians in these names with a "Greek accent". And what was the true name of these rivers, which is assigned by the indigenous people of these areas? In the ancient Persian language there were only three vowel sounds: "a, u, y", a language that passed from ancient Turan, so the letter "I" is clearly not of Turanian origin. Syr-Darya - "Ak-Sart" and Amu-Darya - "Ak-Su", which is more consistent with the correct pronunciation in the Turanian languages. "Sart" in one of the dialects of the Turanian language is translated as "red", "Ak" - light, white. And the phrase "Ak-Sart" is accordingly translated as "Yellow" river. In ancient times, European merchants went for "Silk and silk fabrics" to the "Yellow" river, which is located in Central Asia (!!!), An even more confusing and difficult to understand topic in the history of mankind is the onomastics of peoples and states. The Latin Empire, the empire of Alexander the Great, is nothing more than a verbal image, clearly calculated for some Western European states to declare themselves the direct heirs of these mythical empires.

Here are short excerpts from various world and Russian chronicles:

"Adalbert of Trier from the Benedictine Order in Trier, at the suggestion of Otto I, went to Russia in 961 to the Grand Duchess Olga to preach the Christian faith" …

"Titmar of Merseburg writes about the visit of Prince Vladimir Bruno of Kverfursky on the way to the Pechenegs" …

“Pavel Aleppsky wrote about the Journey of the Patriarch of Antioch to Russia” …

“Vsevolod Aleksandrovich, Prince Kholmsky, returning to Tver from the Horde, met in Bezdezh with his uncle, Vasily Mikhailovich, Prince of Kashinsky, who was going to the Horde with rich gifts, and robbed him” …

“Abu-Hamid-Andalusi (Andalusian, Spaniard), an Arab traveler who visited the country of the Volga Bulgarians in the 12th century. His journey did not reach us, but the Arab writer Qazvini cites excerpts from it …

What do these five excerpts have in common? What unites them In exposing our history?

- There is no mention of countries, peoples and nationalities! Before the spread of printed publications, until about the XIV century, there was no division of peoples into races and nationalities. States had no borders, humanity at the everyday, everyday level, differed only in place of residence. In the above excerpts, the "heroes" of the chronicles are accompanied by the words of their place of residence.

Pavel Aleppsky from Aleppo, Abu-Hamid-Andalusi from Andalusia, we are also familiar from history: the philosopher Al-Farabi from Farab, mathematician Mohamed Ibn-Musa Al-Khorezmi from Khorezm, Ahmed Al-Fergani from Fergana. In everyday life we find types of peoples: Bukhara merchants, Indians from the Indus, Athenians from Athens, Genoese from Genoa, Venetians, Romans, etc.

All this has been preserved in history, it is enough to read the title of the Russian monarch, where the residence of the peoples is clearly expressed, regardless of their nationality in the listed cities: - We (name), the Emperor and autocrat of all Russia, Moscow, Kiev, Vladimir, Novgorod and Tsar Kazan, Astrakhan, Siberian and a dozen more cities, and ending with the title: - Sovereign of the Kartalin and Georgian kings, Cherkassk and Mountain princes.

The Slavs are sometimes identified with the Scythians, then they are produced from the Sarmatians, the Russians are brought from Sweden from the Normans, the Varangians; then from the Baltic region from the Borussians (Prussians); from the Urals they produce from the Huns and Budins, from the Caucasus from the Ross-Alans, Scythians, etc. But all this is superficial, an innuendo - to hide the fact that the settlement of Europe took place from the east. The names of peoples were also formed from the place of residence, for example, the old city, “lost” in the chronicles and historiography of Russia, the city of Slovensk, located on Lake Ilmensky, its inhabitants “Glory, Slavs”, the city of Bulgar corresponds to the people - “Bulgars”. Merchants who came to buy furs marked their place of residence: - "from the extreme" or in the local dialect "from the extreme". The Don steppe was the extreme border of humanity before the settlement of Europe.