Analysis of key messages of the president or the box of promises is overflowing

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

On February 20, the President's Address to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation took place. What are the key messages contained in the Message, we will analyze in this article.

The President began his Address by focusing on the country's internal problems. Indeed, this is an objective factor, since the population's dissatisfaction with domestic policy is growing from year to year, and the state is not able to solve the problems of the population.

If nothing is done, then the collapse of management is objectively inevitable due to the discrepancy between the management system and the management object.

In particular, Vladimir Putin emphasized:

“… I would like to pay special attention to the tasks set in the May Decree, deployed in national projects. Their content and guidelines reflect the needs and expectations of the country's citizens."

In the very first words, the president contradicts himself. The tasks outlined in the Decree and the national projects do not reflect the needs and expectations of the country's citizens, since they are really only private tasks that are not related to the country's development goals.

“National projects are built around a person, for the sake of achieving a new quality of life for all generations, which can only be ensured with the dynamic development of Russia. Our goals are long-term. But it is necessary to work towards strategic goals today."

It is not clear what new quality and what strategic goals are being discussed, if not a single document reflects this new quality and goals, and the state ideology is prohibited by the Constitution of the Russian Federation.

If the vector of goals is not identified within the framework of its concept of globalization management, if the whole culture is not built to ensure the achievement of goals, then work automatically goes to another concept and people feel it, especially clearly in the last two years, when, contrary to people's opinion, their quality of life has been reduced by actually abolishing pension provision - since many simply will not live up to this pension.

In addition, for each important area, control parameters for achieving the goals of the area should be indicated. By fulfilling these control parameters, one can judge whether a society is developing or not.

In the indicated Decree, in most areas there are no such control parameters, there are mainly free parameters that do not characterize development and in fact replace it with chatter.

Only a smaller part of the Decree is written on the merits of the case. The inadequacy of most of the Decree raises the question of the need to develop a strategy for the development of society by the society itself, if the country's leadership is unable or unwilling to do so.

The main goal is demography

The President primarily focused on the key, in his opinion, goal:

"Saving the people, which means providing all-round support to families."

It is worth asking yourself the question: can this goal be the key one? This question poses before us another question: who is Man? Why does he live on this planet? For survival in spite of circumstances or for other purposes?

Any civilizational building is inclusive in relation to state building.

But if in the West the administrative "elites" were engaged in state and civilizational construction, the circle of which was gradually expanding (the nobility in its composition is wider than the high-born aristocracy, the bourgeoisie and merchants in their composition - wider than the nobility and the high-born aristocracy, modern managers in their composition are wider than the bourgeoisie), then in Russia civilizational building was carried out by the "common people", and state building - by the ruling "elites", whose circle, as well as in the West,was constantly expanding.

This, apparently, can explain both the special “catastrophic” nature of the Russian statehood (although in fact we are talking about its development) and the special “revolutionary character” of the Russian people: the administrative “elites” engaged in state civilizational development did not provide the necessary quality of governance of civilization as a whole. and therefore were swept away by the common people.

What is the meaning of the life of Russian civilization and its key goal?

The meaning of the life of Russian civilization is in building a society of social justice.

This implies the solution of specific problems in each area of human life: in education, it is the upbringing of a real Man, that is, an individual living by conscience and teaching him the methodology of cognition and creativity; in sociology - the organization of the life of society, where there is no place for the exploitation of man by man; in the economy - the satisfaction of demographically determined human needs, and so on.

The meaning of the activities of the Russian "elite" is in the establishment of fascism. The essence of fascism as such, regardless of what you call it, what ideas it hides behind and in what ways it exercises power in society, is the active support by a crowd of "little people" - according to the ideological conviction of themselves - the system of abuse of power by the "elite" oligarchy, which:

• presents unrighteousness as supposedly true "righteousness", and on this basis, distorting the world outlook of people, with all its power, cultivates unrighteousness in society, preventing people from becoming a person;
• under various pretexts, with all her power, she suppresses everyone and everyone who doubts the righteousness of her herself and the policies she implements, and also suppresses those whom she suspects of this.

Having designated the main goal of the development of Russian civilization, it becomes clear that the goal of saving the people is inadequate to Life, since it does not raise the question of a just life order and, by default, proposes to preserve the power of parasites.

This means that it cannot be a key target. This is clearly seen even from the setting of the goal - the people can either decrease or increase in quantitative terms, degrade or develop in qualitative terms.

What is the image behind the word "saving"? An image of a degrading and shrinking people? Following this question, the question arises: why does it decrease and degrade? By asking these questions, dialectically, one can reach an unjust structure of the life of society and imitation of work by the authorities, given for a great good and vigilant work for this good.

According to the president:

“Russia has now entered a very difficult demographic period. Fertility, as you know, is declining. I have already said that the reasons here are purely objective. They are associated with those huge human losses, failures that our country suffered in the XX century, during the Great Patriotic War and in the dramatic years after the collapse of the USSR."

Obviously, this is a lie or stupidity. The key factor in why people do not have children is their decision. The decision is formed in the culture in which people live, and as in any culture there is a set of phenomena that affect this decision.

One of these phenomena is total uncertainty about the future. People are not sure if they will be able to raise their children in such conditions when the government is either stupidly unable to provide a decent life, or just frankly did not give a damn about them. The saddest thing is that everyone knows the truth, except for the initiated.

Further in the Address there is a listing of a number of measures aimed at improving the well-being, primarily of large families.

But it is obvious that the system for assessing the quality of life is inadequate to life itself. To ensure a normal standard of living, it is necessary not to increase the amount of money or reduce taxes, but to provide all the necessary demographic needs of people. By tracking the satisfaction of these needs, it is possible to assess the quality of management, otherwise it will be chatter from year to year, which we observe.

For example, all people need housing, which means that it is necessary to clearly understand whether people are provided with housing and of what quality housing, and to take measures aimed at meeting this need: free allocation of land without delay and resale rights, preferential loans without interest (why feed parasitic intermediaries?) for example, building materials, providing numerous standard house options from the state, etc.

Instead, a haphazard series of ineffective half-measures is proposed, where the state is not responsible for anything, and society is unable to fulfill the duties of the state.

Poverty

"Dear colleagues! The solution of demographic problems, an increase in life expectancy, and a decrease in mortality are directly related to overcoming poverty. Let me remind you that in 2000 there were more than 40 million people outside it. Now it is about 19 million, but this is too much, too much. And we had a situation when this amount went to 15 million, now it has grown a little again. We must, of course, focus our attention on this - on the fight against this phenomenon."

Naturally, the President does not indicate: how is this poverty measured? Poverty is when people are unable to provide all the necessary demographically determined needs. How many poor people are there in Russia then? The vast majority of the population.

The president admits this indirectly:

"Moreover, even more people are actually experiencing serious material problems than those who are officially below this line."

The president preferred to remain silent about the causes of poverty - the wrong social organization of the life of society in accordance with the Western concept of governance in a liberal ideological package, which is alien to society. That is, the problem has not been solved, and is not being solved.

“Today many citizens and families take out loans for various purposes, consumer loans. Of course, you need to understand your responsibility, calculate your strength, all this is understandable. But everything can happen in life and everything happens: loss of a job, and a serious illness.

And in this situation, driving a person into a dead end is the last thing, and it is pointless even from an economic point of view. Additional legal guarantees are needed to protect people. So, I propose to provide for a "mortgage vacation" - we recently talked about this in Kazan - that is, a deferral of payments for citizens who have lost their income."

A sore subject - it is necessary to liquidate the usurers and send them on a mortgage vacation to Magadan. Instead, the president is still unable to protect the people from rampant usury.

Health care

“In remote settlements, there is still a problem even to get to a medical worker, just to get an appointment. Yes, the number of feldsher-obstetric points and mobile medical complexes is growing, but where they still do not exist, it is not easier for a person from general, average figures."

At first, during the presidency, a significant part of medical institutions was liquidated, and now they began to be rebuilt in a worse form. Who is to blame for this?

In general, this section talks about the elimination of the consequences, nothing is said about the occurrence of the causes of morbidity, since the health of people depends on the elimination of these factors. Why?

Ecology

Within the framework of this section, the concept of the future garbage operator was not presented, the president limited himself to general words. The question remained unclear: why the task of 100% waste recycling, as in a number of countries, has not been set? Common words were also voiced regarding the preservation of nature for the future.

Among the positive tasks is the reduction of pollution in industrial centers, however, the task was not set to withdraw polluting enterprises outside the cities, as well as to create special industrial zones to minimize damage to nature and society. In fact, there is no real plan for this point.

Education and culture

In this section, nothing was said about the essence of the problems of the most important life support systems of society - education and culture. It was about providing the Internet and material stimulation of personnel, the creation of cultural and educational centers. At the same time, the systemic degradation of education and culture continues. Does the president understand this?

Salary

In this section, there are traditional speeches about the need to increase the incomes of the population not less than the growth of inflation, but again there is no substantive specificity, including about real inflation. In fact, the population continues to be impoverished.

Economy

As with the other sections, there is no clear picture or purpose. Attention is focused on the need to increase labor productivity, improve the investment climate, infrastructure and training. But again, we are talking about the consequences, not the reasons.

Of the interesting points, the need to increase the production of environmentally friendly products was noted. At the same time, the President did not say anything about the fact that all products must be environmentally friendly to ensure food security.

This can be ensured by recreating a normal system of standardization and certification (GOST) and restructuring the economy to produce demographically determined needs, and not parasitic ones.

Projects

Further speech was devoted to various projects in the Crimea, the Center, the Far East and other parts of the country, aimed at solving a number of regional or interregional problems.

International relationships

Relations with a number of countries are highlighted. In general, however, at the international level, Russia has nothing to offer even to its closest allies (partners), because the policy implemented by the Russian elite in practice shows unfair relations within the country, which means that it is also impossible to expect a fair policy outside, which is rightly pointed out by foreign partners and representatives peoples of other countries, expecting from Russia, when it will again offer the world the idea of justice, and not oligarchic-liberal fascism. And, of course, traditionally the West was told about Russian weapons.

Conclusion

In general, the Address does not fundamentally differ from the President's previous speeches. It does not represent a systemic strategy for the development of society, does not meet the interests of the development of society, and reflects public opinion.

This is a "patchwork quilt" sewn by Moscow would-be analysts, which does not correspond to the goals of civilizational construction carried out by the people themselves and the conceptual power of Russian civilization.

Further, there is a question: will the policy of state power correspond to the goals of the people (will the management system correspond to the object of management), or the current elite will self-destruct, as happened with its predecessors (and the object of management will give rise to a new management system)?

Society is faced with the following questions: self-organization, the creation of a parallel system of personnel training and the development of a real strategy of civilizational development and its implementation.

IAC