When, in fact, did Christianity come to Russia?

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

It is striking, of course, how easy it is to mislead a person. and a whole nation or even a continent seems to be even easier. You just need to cut off the ties of generations in time and maintain false attitudes among a part of the population. since childhood.

It is not even necessary for everyone, if there is a group of people with the same views, they will gradually pull the rest into their faith with the scattered ones.

We absolutely thoughtlessly rely on the memory of generations, although in our own memory, with our older relatives, an experiment was carried out, completely openly, with a change in consciousness and worldview.

I am now without osenka of the Revolution itself, I mean the reformatting of the generation. And how then everyone ran at a run "to the origins." That all were atheists "with a fig in your pocket"? Did you read books on scientific communism during the day, and in the evening did you intensively study the law of God? Yes, come on!

At first it was interesting, then for the company, then the priests were made fashionable secular characters, and in the end, human greed. Like, if they offer a free afterlife, why not take it? Tithing seems not to be asked yet! And in the end, we welcome the law on insulting the feelings of the believer. Bitch, in a secular state !!!

By the way, I am not at all against the soul and afterlife adventures, but let's look at everything soberly and study from all sides, and not go thoughtlessly baptized in institutions with a necrophilic tinge!

The entire Abrahamic trinity (Judaism, Christianity and Islam) is a set of fairy tales that were imposed on the population in the 19th century, permanently destroying those who remembered that nothing like this had happened before. Permanent meat grinder of the 19th century and 2 hypermixes of the 20th, and write everything in your brains what you want. To whom Christ, to whom Marx.

I also understand the interest of the Jews in their worship of Yahweh. He promised them exclusivity, made them the chosen people, gave the entire Earth, and assigned the rest of the nations to serve them. In principle, you can walk in such a fog. Self-esteem will clearly only benefit.

And in Christianity (regardless of denominations)? Not only does Christ openly say that he came only to the Jews, so he did not move from this place to the final.

So in the annotations of the 19th century it is said that Christ came to correct the lost Jews, and called the pagans dogs (remember the story of the son of a Samaritan woman?). In general, even from this page it is clear that by 1961 a complete interpretation of the hastily invented religion had not yet been created. Savm the interpreter floats in the material and illogically contradicts himself, Christ and his earthly goals, which we know now.

The whole movement with the conversion of the pagans went from Mr. Savel, who, there was something like that in a cave. This is even if you follow the fabulous canons.

And if you look with an unclouded gaze, you can immediately see very clearly that all this was invented in the 19th century.

Here you can see for yourself that the name of Christ begins to be exaggerated in print media exactly (!!!) after 1860. You can see with your own eyes and check with your questions. And this is with the limitless possibilities of those who promoted, then this idea, to rewrite not only books but also three letters on the fence.

In the end, even the Orthodox Church does not deny that the Bible was translated into Russian no earlier than 200 years ago. And what have you read 800 years before?

Here (evidence from 1884), in a selection of photographs from books of the late 19th century, it can be seen that in Russia there is such a variety of churches and confessions that any sects of the 90s would be envious.

Is this called the millennial faith of our fathers? How many of them did we have then? Are the entire population the sons of the regiment without exception?

In general, with the analysis of Christianity, I was in a hurry. At the end of the 19th century, the Old Testament was not yet fully formed, it is being finalized and improved in the process of application.

While the pentateuch is nothing more than folk tales.

What to do with the dictation, then it is not clear….

Further, in general, there are many letters on the topic of not taking everything literally, these are the works of Moses, not God. Like, why did you find fault with him?

I liked the discussion of God the father and God the son about the creation of man. If only the Jews would be "happy" now that Jesus is registered in their sacred books, and they drove him away. By the way, the plural of Elohim (from El) during the creation of a person will remain in subsequent versions, which now gives a clue to lovers of paleocontact.

There is nothing strange in all this. Normal living process of grinding and finishing. The problem is one - this is the 19th century. A HUNDRED YEARS AGO nobody knows anything. There is a base meat strap on in flight.

What should be done next? Right! Support literacy with factual material. And, of course, the artifacts immediately lined up.

They are found retroactively so as not to cause a stir. Like, it’s been lying for a long time, we just didn’t brag about it.

And you can fix it and, allegedly, by the loss of artifacts. It is all the more interesting how all the other documents of that time disappeared, and this one lies.

At the same time, there is no trace of "two thousand years" of Christianity in the world.

Some in the forest, some for firewood and pork.

And who, even out of principle, is not going to believe in the remake. Quite sensible. You don't run to accept Scientology either, do you?

In order not to frighten the rest, they begin to ascribe to them some kind of Old Belief. Like they believe the same thing, but without the modern polish.

As if, even if we do not go beyond traditional history, it is clear why it was handed over to Napoleon. Well this is a hotbed of opportunism!

To make the picture more varied and not create the impression of the baptism of "backward" Russia, let's look at Europe. There it turns out, too, people are not yet accustomed to the necrophilic, depressive, fixated on death, discouraging any desire to live a new belief.

It can be seen that people are unusual and very reluctant to live under the constant fear of Divine revenge. They are accustomed to rejoicing, and not hanging out in eternal mourning putting an end to themselves.

By the way, we have everything the same.

And no sorrows. Because they were not dominated all their life by the afterlife ruler, or even worse, an opponent invented by him.

Anyway. Someone has mourning, someone has no time for all sorts of sorrows. Some have a cathedral on their nose, where they must recognize his infallibility, and at the same time raise the Mother of God to the same rank, but from a more physical aspect of the issue. The Pope longs to be always right, they are going to make the Mother of God always a virgin.

In the courtyard of the late 19th century. Some of the main dogmas are in limbo. How is this even possible, if people for 2000 (!!!) years believed, prayed, killed (!!!) for their faith and after all this is not yet aware of ordinary physiology? Albeit magical.

But if we again remove the historical and church noodles from our ears, then it is completely clear that by that time nothing much was known about Christ or his era. Everyone draws according to their understanding.

Like the 13th century. It turns out then that the saints had a cap with a peg a la budenovka and a compact shield. Probably to fight off heretics. The name of the saint, by the way, is Hippolytus.

The author of the picture, and this was, by the way, one of the highest ranks of the Academy of Arts, a reproach for indulging ancient debauchery and worshiping the cult of the body. The end of the 19th century, the beginning of the height of the imposition of Christian morality - universal shame and guilt.

And I was more interested in the inconspicuous icon drawn in the lower left corner of the picture. If not visible there - here is the original.

Interestingly, Karl Bryullov deliberately put the Lucifer badge on the picture with Christ, or at that time they had not yet developed a map of the struggle between good and evil in Christianity, and was the savior himself called the son of the morning star who brings the light? If you remember, he confirms this in the gospel. With your lips.

A scene in the Gensilgtor Garden at the end of the 19th century splits the faithful like a nut. Together with, respectively, with the Last Supper. It was necessary either to take the side of Ionnes and then admit that the picture was fake and Christ did not pray in the garden, or to stand shoulder to shoulder with Mark, Matthew and Luke who have prayer in the garden and the momentary weakness of Jesus, who does not really want to die on the cross, is, but there is no parting speech to the Apostles during the feast.

The newspaper critic kicked the Russians once again, saying that such a young nation is not yet able to understand highly educated and wise Europeans who can afford to portray Jesus as gloomy and unpleasant old.

I probably lagged behind even those half-monkeys that the critic considers the Russians of the late 19th century, because, in general, I don't really understand how you can wait for grace and enjoy images of a person (a god-man, not the essence) dying in torment on the cross?

Well, this issue is being discussed now. Was Christ married, was Mary his companion Magdalene, and where are the heirs now? There are many options, you can choose at least the film Dogma, even the book film The Da Vinci Code with the continuation (s).

Today the question is closed by the priests - there is only one bride for Christ and this is the apostolic church. And then, as you can see, he even painted very much.

Another question regarding the female sex and her participation in the affairs of the Gospel, now under such a taboo that in doubt, you can get it on the scoreboard, not even with a censer from the priest, but from an ordinary believer. Especially if he is of Hispanic blood.

Interestingly, they at least remember that besides the Mother of God there is the very object of her holiness?

at the end of 19, the theme of the immaculate conception and the divinity of the mother of Jesus caused laughter and jokes. Not in greasy conversations of men over a bottle, but quite to themselves in the central newspapers.

Talking about cases of trade in counterfeit antiques and documents signed by famous people in France, the newspaper draws parallels in this way.

As you can see, the discussion at the highest level of the virginity of the mother of Christ causes nothing but ridicule.

And on the nose, nevertheless, the cathedral !! Dad fidgets nervously. The Mother of God is calm because she is a myth. Clerics are ready to fight for their version of the gynecological element.

And the history, meanwhile, is filled with creators paid in advance.

Such, it turns out, the Madonna and Child took place in the imagination of the ivory masters of the 14-16 centuries.

Or any work of human hands that does not look like a plow or a horseshoe, and which they did not manage to destroy, immediately becomes an artifact in the name of the Christian faith.

How do you like this cross of early Christianity in Novgorod?

It turns out earlier that these signs were mistakenly (and, by the way, right that they changed their minds) were mistaken for runes, and now they have found out for sure that this is early Christianity.

Probably people believed in something even before the beginning of the 19th century, it may well be from there.

But, returning to the upcoming cathedral and everything that has been described here. How did mankind live for so many years with a religion where, after 1900 years, half of the canons and foundations are controversial in the largest confession?

Taking into account the fact that we are not talking about scientific debate in an educational or research institution, but about divine essences, it turns out that by the end of the 19th century, the followers of Christianity did not have the main thing - faith!

How then did it, in principle, hold out for so many years and how did the martyrs die in his honor, on, frankly, not the most humane torture?

Yes, because there were no those years. You can attribute this to catastrophes, historical shifts, or another hidden reason, but it is absolutely clear that the religion is new, not yet inhabited, and there can be no talk of any kind.

As an example, a note about why it suddenly became necessary to introduce the already very bloated trinity, as the essence of God, also the Mother of God.

I highly recommend reading. These couple of paragraphs are perhaps more useful in understanding the picture than anything you saw here before …

I hope you clearly see that the Greek Olympus was still in its prime yesterday and even honest believers in the New Testament feel the breath of each of the members of the Pantheon behind them.

1870s Lev Soloviev - Monks. We stopped in the wrong place. (some know her as "Repin's Painting" Swam ")

Hope everyone knows this picture. It doesn't matter what the name is.

Can you now imagine a situation where women are completely in fig?

Of course not.

Screeching, screaming, running around, whipping monks with wet rags with shouts of "lustful goat (goats)", that's what will happen now when you try to repeat it. Not a single monk can even swim so close - he will be sunk, sent out at a distance by patrol.

And only 150 years have passed with the communist ideological morality and the Christian cult of "shame". But an absolutely logical picture and behavior of people who lived yesterday during the deification of the naked body, which was practiced in Greco-Roman culture.

So that in this picture, as apparently in ordinary life at the end of the 19th century, the alien element is clergymen, and not naked women. In which of the clay tablets did Aphrodite or Pallas Athena write about being ashamed of your own body? Not in any.

They are not ashamed. Then they will be driven into depression and complexes. Under the guise of Christian morality.

With all due respect to the divine greatness, beauty, wisdom and what else she had, Aphrodite, for 2000 years it is impossible to remember the old gods, when around you there are crusades, the Inquisition and witch hunts.

Not to mention the brainwashing and constant intimidation with crosses, coffins, remains, zombie walking around buildings and the funeral liturgies of ministers.

Impossible. This means that the belief in life for the sake of death and the imposition on a living oneself, the cross after the grave, has been with us very recently and there are chances of recovery.

I do not really believe that in this long story, at least someone got to the end, but if there are such, I am certainly grateful and admired. Regardless of your point of view on the topic of the note.