How do intelligence agencies fund rappers to control youth?
How do intelligence agencies fund rappers to control youth?

Video: How do intelligence agencies fund rappers to control youth?

Video: How do intelligence agencies fund rappers to control youth?
Video: Cybernetic Communism | 1 2024, May
Anonim

How often do we think about what goes into our ears? Let's say what kind of music we are forced to listen to when we walk around the supermarket, what kind of information is poured out of the radio, while we are half asleep on our way to work, what message is making its way through our playlist, and most importantly, does it all have any meaning? ?

Maybe you shouldn't pay attention to such nonsense? Well, today we will take a look at the current data on what power over us music has, and you yourself will decide whether such issues are worth your attention.

Let's start with the already mentioned supermarkets. It turns out that with well-chosen music you can get you to buy certain foods. For example, if you play French or German music, you will select a drink from the respective country. If this music suddenly turns out to be classical, then you will spend significantly more money. For example, buy not cheap swill, but some expensive elite wine. But what's more, music will not only make you shell out for booze, but also improve its taste perception. For example, recent studies have found that the taste of alcohol magically improves when certain music is played. Psychology professor Adrian North writes in his book Social and Applied Psychology of Music: “Music physiologically affects our brain. It will make you walk faster or slower through the store, depending on what the salesperson wants. It can influence your choice of products, how long you make a purchasing decision, and how carefully you think about it.”

However, supermarkets, unnecessary expenses and deceived taste are, of course, children's toys. I would like to know, can music influence the behavior of large groups of the population? Can it change values, be a diversionary, ideological weapon? Of course, we will not find research on this topic, their results are hidden behind the closed doors of the archives of the special services, but a lot can be understood from the actions of the special services themselves. For example, recently it became known that the United States, in its endless attempts to overthrow the government in Cuba, sponsored the activities of certain rap groups. For US money, concerts were organized, lyrics were written, gifts were given, equipment was provided, and PR was paid. It is unlikely that the most powerful empire that ate a dog on such things would just waste money. Most likely, music is a good manipulation tool. While a common man in the street thinks that he is having fun, he is ideologically reflashed.

In general, art has always been an instrument of ideological warfare. At one time, the CIA even sponsored abstract expressionism around the world, buying paintings by artists such as Jackson Pollock for big money. What for? To embarrass the Soviet people, to show them that everything is possible in the West: even to become a rich man, selling such "art". But today we are talking about music, because it has truly powerful manipulative properties, for example, it synchronizes the brains of people listening to rhythmic music. Their wave activity has leveled off and becomes simultaneous, the Crowd not only begins to act, but also to think in unison, which is why drumming is so often heard in war, and shamans use the rhythm to put people into a trance in their ceremonies.

But that's not all. Music can be used not only to raise morale, discontent and revolutionary sentiments among the population, but also to completely crush its psyche. For example, inmates at Guantánamo prison are tortured with the same music that we listen to.

In short, music is an extremely flexible instrument, capable of much in the right hands, and it seems to me that we pay prohibitively little attention to what gets into our ears.

Someone will say that self-expression should not be limited, that creativity and art cannot be censored, well, if someone wants to sexualize children in their songs, it's okay, the market will decide. And few people are interested, for example, in studies of this kind, which show that modern popular culture under the category "for all ages" significantly sexualizes the behavior of children. Eight-year-old girls, repeating after Lady Gaga or Katty Perry, suddenly express a desire to wear short skirts, paint their lips, emulate the sexual movements of adults, stick out their crotch and use vulgar language with boys.

Speaking of all this, I cannot imagine a world in which no one would use this tool. For example, to confuse a certain nation. Or even a whole class all over the world, but anyway … Think that you are listening.

Recommended: